Does ought imply can?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Most philosophers believe that a person can have an obligation only insofar as she is able to fulfil it, a principle generally referred to as "Ought Implies Can". Arguably, this principle reflects something basic about the ordinary concept of obligation. However, in a paper published recently in this journal, Wesley Buckwalter and John Turri presented evidence for the conclusion that ordinary people in fact reject that principle. With a series of studies, they claimed to have demonstrated that, in people's judgements, obligations persist irrespective of whether those who hold them have the ability to fulfil them. We argue in this paper that due to some problems in their design, Buckwalter & Turri's conclusions may not be warranted. We present the results of a series of studies demonstrating the problems with their design and showing that, with an improved design, people judge that obligation depends on ability after all.
منابع مشابه
‘ Ought ’ and ‘ Better ’
Sentences using ‘ought’ appear to have some kind of non-descriptive force (e.g. commending, guiding actions, committing the speaker), in which case it would seem that no ‘ought’ statement can follow logically from purely factual statements lacking such force. Yet from factual statements about slowness and liability to breakdown of alternative means of transport it seems possible validly to infe...
متن کاملA Social Pragmatic View on the Concept of Normative Consistency
The programmatic statement put forward in von Wright’s last works on deontic logic introduces the perspective of logical pragmatics, which has been formally explicated here and extended so to include the role of norm-recipient as well as the role of normgiver. Using the translation function from the language of deontic logic to the language of set-theoretical approach, the connection has been e...
متن کاملSome Difficulties of Ecological Thinking, Considered From a Critical Systems Perspective: A Plea for Critical Holism
We probably have simplified matters too much. We tend to talk about systems thinking and practice as if we knew what they are. The fashionable call for "holistic" or "systems" thinking in ecological issues provides a major example. This much is certain: the quest for comprehensiveness, although it represents an epistemologically necessary idea, is not realizable. If we assume that it is realiza...
متن کاملOughts and Ends
As this ought, or ought not, expresses some new relation or affirmation, ‗tis necessary that it shou'd be observ'd and explain'd' and at the same time that a reason should be given; for what seems altogether inconceivable, how this new relation can be a deduction from others, which are entirely different from it. Hume never actually asserted what has come to be called ‗Hume's Law': that you can...
متن کامل